Seattle City Council Bills and Ordinances
Information modified on October 8, 2007; retrieved on August 15, 2025 7:43 PM
Ordinance 122493
Introduced as Council Bill 116012
Title | |
---|---|
AN ORDINANCE relating to the selection of providers of and standards for indigent public defense services and amending Ordinance 121501. |
Description and Background | |
---|---|
Current Status: | Passed |
Fiscal Note: | Fiscal Note to Council Bill No. 116012 |
Index Terms: | LOW-INCOME, CRIMINAL-OFFENSES, LEGAL-ASSISTANCE, CRIMINAL-JUSTICE |
Notes: | Returned unsigned by Mayor 9/21/07. |
References: | Amending: Ord 121501 |
Legislative History | |
---|---|
Sponsor: | LICATA | tr>
Date Introduced: | September 4, 2007 |
Committee Referral: | Public Safety, Governmental Relations and Arts |
City Council Action Date: | September 10, 2007 |
City Council Action: | Passed |
City Council Vote: | 8-0 (Excused: Drago) |
Date Delivered to Mayor: | September 11, 2007 |
Date Signed by Mayor: (About the signature date) | September 21, 2007 |
Date Filed with Clerk: | September 21, 2007 |
Signed Copy: | PDF scan of Ordinance No. 122493 |
Text | |
---|---|
AN ORDINANCE relating to the selection of providers of and standards for indigent public defense services and amending Ordinance 121501. WHEREAS, it is a constitutional requirement, a requirement of Chapter 10.101 RCW and a public purpose that each person charged with a crime punishable by incarceration or involved in certain other proceedings that may result in loss of liberty or loss of fundamental rights, be provided with effective legal representation in order to ensure equal justice under law without regard to his or her ability to pay; and WHEREAS, effective legal representation should be provided consistent with the constitutional requirements of fairness, equal protection, and due process in all cases where the right to counsel attaches; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of The City of Seattle (the "City"), consistent with Chapter 10.101 RCW and other applicable law, to make such services available in an efficient manner which provides effective representation at reasonable cost to the city; and WHEREAS, the provision of indigent public defense services by nonprofit service providers helps ensure a client focus by those entrusted with representing indigent persons; and WHEREAS, a non-profit board of directors is generally representative of the community it serves, and the City Council desires Seattle's public defense program to be representative of the community it serves; and WHEREAS, the American Bar Association recommends an average of 6 hours per case bringing the optimum number of cases handled by attorney to 275 per year; and WHEREAS, the King County Bar Indigent Defense Services Task Force developed a 300 case per attorney, per year guideline in 1982; and WHEREAS, the Seattle City Council adopted Resolution 27696 on September 28, 1987, adopting a framework and schedule for implementing recommendations contained in the 1987 Public Defender Salary and Caseload Review conducted by City Council staff, which report led to a 1989 City Council Budget Intent Statement (attached as Attachment 1 and incorporated herein by reference) establishing a 380 case per-attorney, per-year limit, and conditions leading to those recommendation have not materially changed; and WHEREAS, the City is guided by the standards referenced in Chapter 10.101 RCW and the American Bar Association's (ABA's) Ten Principles of a Public Defense Delivery System attached as Attachment 2 and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, in 2004, the City Council passed Ordinance 121501, stating that public defense agreements shall require caseloads no higher than 380 cases per attorney per year; and WHEREAS, a 2007 City of Seattle Audit found that the Office of Management and Planning's (OMP's) method of determining attorney caseload is not an accurate measure of workload and can conflict with the City caseload standard of 380 annual cases per attorney specified in Ordinance 121501; and the Auditor further found that in 2005 and 2006, the current primary public defense agency's caseload exceeded the standard established in Ordinance 121501; and WHEREAS, the Audit also commented on OMP's Request for Proposals process, observing that the Mayor appointed all the members of the 2004 proposal review committee, and recommended that the Executive and City Council should decide whether this Mayoral role provides sufficient independence as outlined in the ABA principles; and WHEREAS, overall, this 2007 City Audit contains 36 recommendations for improving the City's public defense program, including a recommendation to have a larger secondary public defense agency; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS: Section A. Ordinance 121501 is hereby amended as follows:
Section 1. In order to provide for indigent public defense services in a manner that is free from political influence, Section 2. The duties of the panel shall be to review, and recommend from among, the proposals submitted in response to the Request for Proposals to provide indigent defense services received from nonprofit corporations formed for the express purpose of providing legal services to persons eligible for representation through a public defense program. In addition to any other materials provided by proposers, the panel shall consider any City Audits of its indigent defense programs; and shall, before the end of the 20082010 defense contract term, review the Washington State Bar Association caseload recommendations and report to the City Council on any need to amend the caseload standards in this ordinance.
Section
Section
Section
Section Section 7. The City Council requests the Seattle City Auditor to audit compliance in the first quarter of 2010 with the standards established by this ordinance for the public defense contract enacted for the 2008 2010 period. Section B. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten (10) days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Municipal Code Section 1.04.020. Passed by the City Council the ____ day of _________, 2007, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of __________, 2007. _________________________________ President __________of the City Council Approved by me this ____ day of _________, 2007. _________________________________ Gregory J. Nickels, Mayor Filed by me this ____ day of _________, 2007. ____________________________________ City Clerk Attachment 1: 1989 City Council Budget Intent Statement Attachment 1 is a 59 KB PDF document, requiring Adobe Acrobat or equivalent program to view. Attachment 2: American Bar Association's Ten Principles of a Public Defense Delivery System Attachment 2 is a 376 KB PDF document, requiring Adobe Acrobat or equivalent program to view. 9/10/07 Version #11 ta |
Attachments |
---|