Form revised February 12, 2004
FISCAL NOTE FOR NON-CAPITAL PROJECTS
Department: |
Contact
Person/Phone: |
DOF Analyst/Phone: |
Executive Administration |
Teri Allen/4.5226 |
Tyler Running Deer/4.8075 |
Legislation Title: |
A RESOLUTION to initiate a Downtown Parking and Business
Improvement Area. |
· Summary of the Legislation:
·
Background:
·
Please check one
of the following:
____ This legislation does
not have any financial implications. (Stop here and delete the remainder of this document prior to saving and
printing.)
__X_ This legislation has financial
implications. (Please complete all relevant sections that
follow.)
Anticipated Revenue/Reimbursement:
Resulting From This Legislation:
This table should reflect revenues/reimbursements that are a direct result of
this legislation. In the event that the
issues/projects associated with this ordinance/resolution have revenues or
reimbursements that were, or will be, received because of previous or future
legislation or budget actions, please provide details in the Notes section
below the table.
Fund Name and
Number |
Department |
Revenue Source |
2004 Revenue |
2005 Revenue |
19855 Metropolitan Improvement District |
Executive Administration |
Ratepayer Assessments |
$1,919,000 |
$3,895,570 |
TOTAL |
|
|
$1,919,000 |
$3,895,570 |
Notes:
The fiscal year of the
proposed DBIA runs from July 1 to June 30.
2004 revenue is based upon one-half of projected revenue ($3,838,000)
for the first fiscal year (2004-2005).
The 2005 revenue estimates assume a 3% inflationary adjustment in the
second half of the year, as provided under the proposed legislation.
Over the
ten-year life of this legislation, the special assessment will provide
approximately $38 million in revenue for project, operations and maintenance
costs of the DBIA. The Department of
Executive Administration (DEA) would collect the assessments from the
ratepayers, but the funds would then be kept by DEA only for reimbursement to
the Downtown Seattle Association (DSA), which is the agency that would actually
administer the staffing, projects and other costs associated with the DBIA.
Total Regular
Positions Created Or Abrogated Through This Legislation, Including FTE Impact: This table should only reflect the actual number of
positions created by this legislation
In the event that positions have been, or will be, created as a result
of previous or future legislation or budget actions, please provide details in
the Notes section below the table.
Position Title and Department* |
Fund Name |
Fund Number |
Part-Time/ Full Time |
2004 Positions |
2004 FTE |
2005 Positions** |
2005 FTE** |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||||||||
* List each position separately
** 2005 positions and FTE are total 2005 position changes resulting from this legislation, not incremental changes. Therefore, under 2005, please be sure to include any continuing positions from 2004
Notes:
· Do positions sunset in the future? (If yes, identify sunset date):
Not applicable.
Spending/Cash Flow: This table should be completed only in those
cases where part or all of the funds authorized by this legislation will be
spent in a different year than when they were appropriated (e.g., as in the
case of certain grants and capital projects).
Details surrounding spending that will occur in future years should be
provided in the Notes section below the table.
Fund Name and
Number |
Department |
Budget Control
Level* |
2004 Expenditures |
2005
Anticipated Expenditures |
19855 Metropolitan Improvement District |
Executive Administration |
Not applicable. |
$1,919,000 |
$3,895,570 |
TOTAL |
|
|
$1,919,000 |
$3,895,570 |
* See budget book to obtain the appropriate Budget Control Level for your department.
Notes: Over the ten-year life of this legislation, the special assessment will provide approximately $38 million in revenue for project, operations and maintenance costs of the DBIA. Again, DEA would collect the assessments from the ratepayers, but the funds would then be kept by DEA only for reimbursement to the DSA, which would actually administer the staffing, projects and other costs associated with the DBIA.
·
What is the
financial cost of not implementing the legislation? (Estimate the costs to the City of not
implementing the legislation, including estimated costs to maintain or expand
an existing facility or the cost avoidance due to replacement of an existing
facility, potential conflicts with regulatory requirements, or other costs if
the legislation is not implemented.)
None. The DBIA is established
as a revenue-neutral program.
What are the possible alternatives to the legislation that could achieve
the same or similar objectives? (Include
any potential alternatives to the proposed legislation, such as reducing
fee-supported activities, identifying outside funding sources for fee-supported
activities, etc.)
None. Improvement area services
are in addition to, and not a replacement of, basic City services, and are funded
by assessments on the properties that benefit from the services. If the legislation is not passed, the
services under the improvement area will not be provided.
·
Is the legislation
subject to public hearing requirements:
(If yes, what public hearings
have been held to date, and/or what plans are in place to hold a public
hearing(s).)
Yes. The resolution establishes
a hearing date of April 21, 2004.
·
Other Issues
(including long-term implications of
the legislation): None.
Please list attachments to the fiscal note below:
Exhibit A: Map of proposed DBIA.