Form revised May 5, 2009

 

FISCAL NOTE FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS ONLY

 

Department:

Contact Person/Phone:

DOF Analyst/Phone:

Parks and Recreation

Donald Harris / 684-8018

Jennifer Devore / 615-1328

 

Legislation Title:

AN ORDINANCE relating to the Department of Parks and Recreation; authorizing the acquisition of a conservation easement on property located in the Maple Leaf neighborhood and commonly known as Waldo Woods; authorizing acceptance of the deed of conservation easement for open space purposes; increasing appropriations to the Department of Parks and Recreation in the 2010 Budget; all by a three-fourths vote of the City Council.

 

 

Summary and background of the Legislation:

The proposed legislation authorizes the acquisition of a conservation easement on a wooded portion of the historic Waldo Hospital property in the Maple Leaf neighborhood of northeast Seattle (Waldo Woods) for $300,000 and increases the appropriation in the 2010 Adopted Budget.

 

Waldo Woods is located on the former grounds of the region's first osteopathic hospital, opened in 1924 by Dr. William Waldo.  About six years after Dr. Waldo's death in 1962, Camp Fire USA of Central Puget Sound bought the property and used the former hospital as its headquarters.  Three years ago, Camp Fire USA was in talks with Prescott Development, which wanted to buy the site to build townhomes.  The proposed development would have cut a swath of trees in the 85-year-old grove.  Ultimately, Prescott Development decided not to acquire the property.

Meanwhile, The Maple Leaf Community Council sought funds from King County and contributions from the community to preserve Waldo Woods as open space.  The King County Council subsequently awarded $300,000 for the “Waldo Woods Conservation Easement” project in the 2009 Conservation Futures Levy allocations (“CFL”) list of Seattle Projects Funded.

 

In 2009, the Waldo Hospital property was acquired by the Menachem Mendel Seattle Cheder, a private school.  The school desires to protect the trees and is willing to sell a conservation easement to the City of Seattle for the amount of the CFL funding.  The difference between the fair market value of the conservation easement and the purchase price ($300,000) will provide the 50% match required to receive CFL reimbursement for the purchase.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Project Name:

Project I.D.

Project Location:

Start Date:

End Date

Waldo Woods Conservation Easement

Project K730011

Maple Leaf

September, 2009

April, 2010

 

·                     Please check any of the following that apply:

 

____    This legislation creates, funds, or anticipates a new CIP Project. (Please note whether the current CIP is being amended through this ordinance, or provide the Ordinance or Council Bill number of the separate legislation that has amended/is amending the CIP.)

 

____    This legislation does not have any financial implications. (Stop here and delete the remainder of this document prior to saving and printing.)

 

__X__ This legislation has financial implications. (Please complete all relevant sections that follow.) 

 

Appropriations:  

Fund Name and Number

Department

Budget Control Level*

Existing 2010 Appropriation

New 2010

Appropriation

(if any)

2011 Anticipated Appropriation

2008 Parks Levy Fund (33860)

Parks and Recreation

2008 Parks Levy – Green Space Acquisition K720011

 

$300,000

 

TOTAL

 

 

 

$300,000

 

 

Notes:  The funds for the purchase of the conservation easement will initially come from the 2008 Parks Levy, the Green Space Acquisition Fund.  The money will be reimbursed by an already awarded, but not yet received, King County Conservation Futures Levy grant.

 

Spending Plan and Future Appropriations for Capital Projects: 

Spending Plan and Budget

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Total

Spending Plan

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Year Appropriation

$300,000

 

 

 

 

 

$300,000

Future Appropriations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funding source:

Funding Source (Fund Name and Number, if applicable)

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Total

Conservation Futures Levy Grant

$300,000

 

 

 

 

 

$300,000

TOTAL

$300,000

 

 

 

 

 

$300,000

Notes:

 

 

Bond Financing Required:  N/A

 

Type

Amount

Assumed Interest Rate

Term

Timing

Expected Annual Debt Service/Payment

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

 

Uses and Sources for Operation and Maintenance Costs for the Project: N/A

O&M

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Total

Uses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Start Up

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On-going

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sources (itemize)

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

Notes: The City has no obligations under the conservation easement that would require O&M costs.  Public access will be limited and stewardship of the forest will be undertaken by a community stewardship organization, as specified in the conservation easement agreement.

DPR staff will make an annual visit to the site to ensure that the provisions of the easement are being met – that the trees are still standing. 

 

 

Periodic Major Maintenance costs for the project:  N/A

 

Major Maintenance Item

Frequency

Cost

Likely Funding Source

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

N/A

N/A

N/A

 

Funding sources for replacement of project:  The project is the purchase of a conservation easement; as such, there would be no replacement costs.

 

 

Total Regular Positions Created, Modified, Or Abrogated Through This Legislation, Including FTE ImpactN/A

 

Position Title and Department*

Position # for Existing Positions

Fund Name & #

PT/FT

2009

Positions

2009

FTE

2010 Positions**

2010 FTE
**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Notes:

 

·         Do positions sunset in the futureN/A

 

·         What is the financial cost of not implementing the legislation? The City would forgo the $300,000 CFL grant from King County if this legislation is not adopted.

 

·         Does this legislation affect any departments besides the originating departmentNo

 

·         What are the possible alternatives to the legislation that could achieve the same or similar objectives?  No alternatives have been identified, other than foregoing the reimbursement or abandoning the project.

 

·         Is the legislation subject to public hearing requirementsNo

 

·         Other Issues: There has been strong community support for preserving Waldo Woods from development.  Purchasing the conservation easement with CFL funds, with the match coming from Menachem Mendel Seattle Cheder is the only viable solution that has emerged.

 

Please list attachments to the fiscal note below:

None