Form revised December 9, 2004
FISCAL NOTE FOR NON-CAPITAL PROJECTS
|
Department: |
Contact
Person/Phone: |
DOF Analyst/Phone: |
|
Seattle City Light |
Mike Little, 684-3233 |
Thomas Dunlap, 386-9120 |
|
Legislation Title:
|
|
AN ORDINANCE relating to the City Light Department;
establishing a voluntary Green-Up Program and amending Section 21.49 of the
Seattle Municipal Code. |
·
Summary of the Legislation: The proposed legislation creates a new voluntary Green-Up Program
that complements the existing voluntary Green Power Program that was initiated
in 2002. This new program offering will
be available to all City Light customers.
However, it is especially designed to meet the growing demands of
medium-to-large commercial and institutional customers that desire to
“green-up” a percentage of their electricity usage. Voluntary customer payments will come through utility bills and
one-time payments. These payments will
be used by City Light to purchase renewable energy products available from
Northwest wind, biomass, and landfill gas projects. Green-Up Program revenues shall also be used to fund the
marketing and administrative costs and expenditures for the program.
· Background: The existing voluntary Green Power Program was authorized by Council Bill 113944 (2001) and amended by Council Bill 114765 (2003). The Program was designed to fund the development of primarily smaller-scale, local renewable energy projects, such as solar, not included in City Light’s power portfolio. Its goals included creating awareness, improving operating experience, and stimulating market demand through technology demonstrations and education. The current program was not designed to allow customers to purchase green power as a percentage of their electricity use.
The proposed Green-Up Program will allow customers to “green-up” a percentage of their electricity use. Much of the recent growth in green power purchases throughout the United States has been due to large business and governmental commitments that require a percentage-based purchase. For example, the General Services Administration, Unico Properties, and a number of Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) projects have expressed an interest in purchasing a green product from the Department. Seattle City Light’s Green-Up Program would help customers meet this growing corporate commitment.
·
Please check one
of the following:
____ This legislation does
not have any financial implications. (Stop here and delete the remainder of this document prior to saving and
printing.)
__X__ This legislation has financial implications. (Please complete all relevant sections that follow.)
Appropriations:
|
Fund Name and Number |
Department |
Budget Control Level* |
2005 Appropriation |
2006 Anticipated Appropriation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
*See budget book to obtain the appropriate Budget Control Level for your department.
Notes: The Department anticipated launching the Green-Up Program when it submitted the 2005/2006 budgets. Within the adopted budget, the Department has sufficient budget authority to operate the program. This legislation is not requesting new budget authority.
Anticipated Revenue/Reimbursement:
Resulting From This Legislation:
|
Fund Name and
Number |
Department |
Revenue Source |
2005 Revenue |
2006 Revenue |
|
41000 |
City Light |
Voluntary Customer payments |
$125,000 |
$225,000 |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
$125,000 |
$225,000 |
Notes: Revenue is estimated based upon customer interest and experience of other electric utilities offering a similar program. The net proceeds from the revenue will be used to fund Green-Up Program marketing and administrative activities.
Total Regular
Positions Created Or Abrogated Through This Legislation, Including FTE Impact:
|
Position Title and Department* |
Fund Name |
Fund Number |
Part-Time/ Full Time |
2005 Positions |
2005 FTE |
2006 Positions** |
2006 FTE** |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Notes:
· Do positions sunset in the future? (If yes, identify sunset date):
Spending/Cash Flow:
|
Fund Name and
Number |
Department |
Budget Control
Level* |
2005 Expenditures |
2006
Anticipated Expenditures |
|
41000 |
City Light |
SCL100 |
$50,000 |
$100,000 |
|
41000 |
City Light |
SCL700 |
$75,000 |
$125,000 |
|
TOTAL |
|
|
$125,000 |
$225,000 |
* See budget book to obtain the appropriate Budget Control Level for your department.
Notes: Anticipate that revenue generated from the program will offset expenditures.
·
What is the
financial cost of not implementing the legislation? There
is minimal direct financial cost of implementing the legislation. However, at the moment, the Department is
offering this type of service to select customers with a customized purchase
agreement that is cumbersome and labor intensive for the Department and the
customer. Providing customers with a
payment option on their utility bill is a simple mechanism to meet their needs
and to reduce the overhead associated with customized purchase agreements.
·
What are the
possible alternatives to the legislation that could achieve the same or similar
objectives? The Department
could continue to offer a "green-up" option via a customized purchase
agreement.
·
Is the
legislation subject to public hearing requirements: No
·
Other Issues
(including long-term implications of
the legislation):
Please list attachments to the fiscal note below:
Attachment: Issues
Brief – Seattle Green-Up Program