Attachment 10

LAND USE APPENDICES

Table of Contents

LAND USE APPENDIX A

Unadopted Urban Center, Urban Village and Manufacturing/Industrial Centers Boundaries A2

LAND USE APPENDIX B

Growth Targets and Planning Estimates for Urban Center Villages, Hub Urban Villages, and Residential Urban Villages A4

LAND USE APPENDIX C

Cumulative Limits on Upzoning Land Zoned Single-family A9

LAND USE APPENDIX CD

Summary of Existing Land Use, Population, and Employment Characteristics A8

LAND USE APPENDIX E

Existing and Proposed Zoned Development Capacity A23

LAND USE APPENDIX DF

Growth Management Projections for the City of Seattle A20

LAND USE APPENDIX E

Open Space and Recreation Facility Goals A21

LAND USE APPENDIX B

Growth Targets and Planning Estimates for Urban Centers, Center Villages, Hub Urban Villages, and Residential Urban Villages

Village

Land

Households (HH)

Employment (Jobs)

 

Area in Acres

Existing

Existing Density

(HH/ Acre)

Growth Target or Planning Estimate1

(HH Growth)

Estimated

2010 Density

Existing

Existing Density

(Jobs/ Acre)

Growth Target or Planning Estimate1

(Job Growth)

Estimated 2010 Density

Urban Centers & Center Villages

                 

Downtown Urban Center Total

945

7,421

7.9

NA114,700

23.4

165,119

175

NA162,700

241

Belltown Village

216

3,492

16.2

6,500

46.3

22,699

105

4,500

126

Denny Triangle Village

143

514

3.6

3,500

28.1

22,010

154

23,600

319

Commercial Core Village

275

1,435

5.2

1300

9.9

106,823

388

27,000

487

Pioneer Square Village

142

376

2.6

2,1002

17.4

9,113

64

4,8002

98

Chinatown/International District Village

169

1,604

9.5

1,300

17.2

4,474

26

2,800

43

First Hill/Cap. Hill Center Total

912

21,673

23.8

NA15,540

30.0

33,393

37

NA111,700

50

First Hill Village

225

5,896

26.2

2400

36.9

20,626

85

6,100

119

Capitol Hill Village

396

12,450

31.4

1980

36.4

5,284

13

3,000

21

Pike/Pine Village

131

2,349

18.0

620

22.7

3,963

30

1,400

41

12th Avenue Village

160

978

6.1

540

9.5

3,520

22

1,200

30

Univ. Community Urban Center Total

770

11,611

15.0

NA121103

17.8

31,427

41

NA18,500

52

University Dist. NW Village

289

4,324

14.9

1630

20.5

8,625

30

3,000

40

Ravenna Village

122

973

8.0

480

12.0

1,580

13

700

19

University Campus Village

359

6313

17.6

03

17.6

21222

59

4800

72

Northgate Urb. Center Total

410

3,291

8.0

NA13,000

15.3

11,366

28

NA19,300

50

Uptown Queen Anne Urb. Center Total

297

3,138

10.6

NA11,312

15.0

19000

64

NA1,3,300

75

Hub Urban Villages4

                 

Ballard

323

4,279

13.2

1,520

17.9

3,518

11

3,700

22

Fremont4

339

3,766

11.1

750

13.5

6,937

20

1,700

25

Lake City4

310

2,740

8.8

1,400

13.3

2,827

9

2,900

18

W. Seattle Junction

225

1,835

8.2

1,100

13.0

3,108

14

2,300

24

Bitter Lake Village4

344

2,271

6.6

1,260

10.3

4,027

12

,2800

20

North Rainier4

415

2,043

4.9

1,200

7.8

3,371

8

3,500

17

South Lake Union4

446

461

1.0

1,700

4.8

15,230

34

4,500

44

Residential Urban Villages

                 

Aurora-Licton4

288

2,106

7.3

900

10.4

NA

NA

NA

NA

Greenwood/Phinney Ridge4

202

1,283

6.4

350

8.1

NA

NA

NA

NA

Upper Queen Anne4

103

1,063

10.3

300

13.2

NA

NA

NA

NA

Eastlake4

205

2,423

11.8

380

13.6

NA

NA

NA

NA

23rd Ave S @ S Jackson-Union4

485

3,186

6.6

900

8.4

NA

NA

NA

NA

Admiral District4

103

798

7.8

340

11.1

NA

NA

NA

NA

Green Lake

107

1,439

13.4

400

17.2

NA

NA

NA

NA

Roosevelt

160

1,007

6.3

340

8.4

NA

NA

NA

NA

Wallingford4

245

1,973

8.1

200

8.9

NA

NA

NA

NA

Rainier Beach

227

1,482

6.5

740

9.8

NA

NA

NA

NA

Columbia City4

313

1,639

5.2

740

7.6

NA

NA

NA

NA

Westwood-Highland Park

278

1,654

6.0

700

8.5

NA

NA

NA

NA

Beacon Hill4

171

1,844

10.8

550

14.0

NA

NA

NA

NA

Crown Hill

173

929

5.4

310

7.2

NA

NA

NA

NA

MLK Jr Wy S @ Holly Street

380

1,247

3.3

8005

5.4

NA

NA

NA

NA

South Park

264

997

3.8

350

5.1

NA

NA

NA

NA

Madison-Miller

145

1,486

10.3

400

13.0

NA

NA

NA

NA

Morgan Junction4

139

1,104

8.0

300

10.1

NA

NA

NA

NA

(Appendix B amended 7/95)

LAND USE ELEMENT APPENDIX B (Continued)

Footnotes

1 Urban centers are not assigned planning estimates. Growth targets for urban centers are established in land use element section C. Growth targets for residential and hub urban villages wereare established in land use element section C upon adoption of aeach neighborhood plan. Separate growth targets for urban center villages are not adopted, planning estimates will remain for guidance and monitoring.

2 Assumes north Kingdome parking lot and vacant floor area in existing structures is available to accommodate a substantial share of household and employment growth.

3 Separate growth targets for the urban center villages within the University Community Urban Center are not adopted. In acting on the UCUC plan, the City Council reaffirmed the targets for the UCUC as a whole. No additional student housing growth according to UW General Physical Development Plan.

4 The areas to which numbers apply for land area, existing households and jobs, planning estimates and existing and planned used to estimate densities for each hub and residential urban villages are the based on preliminary unadopted village boundaries shown in Land Use Appendix A, above. Where adopted boundaries shown in Appendix A have been amended, from the unadopted village boundary,the acreage, existing households and employment, and densities may be different than indicated in this Appendix B. These figures will be updated as new information becomes available.

6 Because of the potential plans for redevelopment of the Holly Park Garden Community according to a neighborhood plan currently underway, a greater growth planning estimate is established for this area relative to other similar residential urban villages.

Growth planning estimates for areas outside of urban villages and centers are as follows:

1. Residential growth:

A. In areas within a quarter mile radius surrounding all neighborhood anchors: 6,000 households

B. In the areas beyond a quarter mile radius surrounding all neighborhood anchors: 9,000 households

2. Employment growth: No specific planning estimate. Areas outside of villages and centers are to share some portion of the 14,660 jobs not estimated for center or hub urban villages, at appropriate development intensities, where current zoning allows, including existing major institutions, industrial areas located outside designated Manufacturing/Industrial Centers, and commercial areas.

LAND USE APPENDIX C

Cumulative Limits on Upzoning Land Zoned Single-family

That Meets Land Use Code Locational Criteria for a Single-family Designation

Village/Center Acres

Northgate 4.2

University District

Northwest 4.7

University village 0

UW Campus .4

Seattle Center 0

Downtown

Denny Regrade 0

Westlake 0

Commercial Core 0

Pioneer Square 0

International District 1

First Hill/Capitol Hill

Capitol Hill 0

Pike/Pine 0

First Hill 0

South Capitol Hill 0

Aurora 130th 31.9

Lake City 77.5

West Seattle Junction 52.3

Fremont 9.2

Ballard 0

Rainier/I90 126.5

South Lake Union 0

Aurora 97th 57.8

Greenwood 131.6

Crown Hill 106.9

Upper Queen Anne 28.8

Eastlake 19.5

23rd Ave. S/S Jackson 157

Beacon Hill 56.4

Columbia City 84.5

Admiral @ California 57.1

MLK & S Holly 116.6

SW Barton St @ 25th SW 141.9

South Park 209.3

21st Ave E./ E Madison 38.1

Green Lake 11.4

Roosevelt 95.3

Wallingford 132.3

Rainier Beach 69.2

California/ SW Morgan 88.3

LAND USE APPENDIX D

Summary of Existing Land Use, Population, and

Employment Characteristics

This section describes the existing arrangement and concentration of uses and activities such as housing, businesses, parks and industries. Detailed discussion of the natural features, platting pattern, transportation facilities and the development pattern is provided in the Draft Comprehensive Plan Land Use Element, published in April 1993.

Land Uses

Seattle encompasses approximately 53,813 acres or about 84 square miles. Land Use Figure A-2 illustrates how the city’s land area is distributed among different types of uses. About 40% of the total land area is occupied by residential uses, most of which is in single-family development. Street rights-of-way take up the next largest amount of land -- almost 26%. Commercial and industrial areas, where most of the jobs in the city are located, occupy about 10%, while public parks account for approximately 9%.

Land Use Figure A-3 illustrates how these various activities are distributed within the city. With the exception of the downtown area and its immediate surroundings, Seattle is predominantly covered by single-family houses and street right-of-way. Most multifamily residences are concentrated in core areas such as First Hill/Capitol Hill and the University District. Jobs are located primarily in commercial and industrial areas such as Downtown, Duwamish, Northgate and the University District.

Types of Housing

Slightly over half of the city’s households are living in detached, single-family houses that occupy 34% of the city’s total land area. Most of these dwellings are located in areas devoted exclusively to low-density development (Land Use Figure A-4). The other half of the city’s households live in some type of multifamily development concentrated on 6% of the city's land area. These multifamily dwellings are in buildings of varying sizes, including small buildings of two to four units (duplexes, triplexes and four-plexes), medium-sized buildings (apartment buildings and condominiums with 10 to 19 units), and large buildings (apartment buildings and condominiums with 20 units or more). Citywide, small multifamily buildings of two to four units account for very little of Seattle’s housing. Most of the city’s multifamily units are in large buildings.

HOUSING AND POPULATION DENSITY

Land Use Figure A-5 shows the distribution of household density in the city expressed as the number of households per gross acre. (Gross acre includes nonresidential uses such as street rights-of-way and parks.) Areas with the highest density of households (hh) are located north of the I-90 freeway. Portions of First Hill/Capitol Hill contain the highest density of households -- in some areas well over 13 hh/gross acre. The next densest areas (11-13 hh/gross acre) include portions of the Denny Regrade, the south slope of Queen Anne Hill and a portion of the University District. Areas of more moderate housing unit density (8-10 hh per gross acre) include West Seattle Junction, Ballard, Wallingford, Eastlake and Madison Park. A population density map (Land Use Figure A-6) is another way of presenting information about where people live. This figure shows a concentration of residents similar to that of the household density map. In addition, it shows isolated areas where a significant concentration of people occur, such as the Highpoint and Holly Park communities.

Land Use Figure A-2

AMOUNT OF LAND AREA BY LAND USE BY DISTRICTS

(in Acres)

DISTRICT

Single

Family

Multi-

family

 

Commercial

 

Industrial

Transport/Comm/Util*

Parks **

Other ***

Rights-of-Way ****

 

Vacant

 

Total

Ballard

1,544.8

249.3

259.6

147.1

38.6

117.3

175.5

958.0

132.1

3,622.3

Capitol Hill

661.7

272.9

144.1

14.8

12.8

333.3

240.7

654.8

90.0

2,425.1

Central

697.5

244.0

86.9

26.0

4.0

143.2

191.7

570.0

179.6

2,142.9

Downtown

0.4

42.9

383.4

27.7

25.4

18.1

207.3

302.7

13.1

1,021.0

Duwamish

1,299.3

153.5

510.8

1,247.3

691.3

312.9

860.6

2,137.1

702.4

7,915.2

Lake Union

495.3

230.3

148.4

73.2

17.7

472.3

113.8

592.7

51.3

2,195.0

North

1,803.7

242.5

265.4

14.8

16.4

233.2

170.8

924.0

110.1

3,780.9

Northeast

2,365.8

333.5

200.0

13.6

12.6

371.5

537.3

1,760.4

113.4

5,708.1

Northwest

2,602.2

388.4

258.8

13.7

13.2

307.5

347.3

1,571.9

229.0

5,732.0

Queen Anne

1,415.3

389.8

232.6

191.4

398.0

870.1

67.0

1,142.2

147.5

4,853.9

Southeast

1,951.4

181.1

122.0

46.4

10.9

658.3

200.0

1,121.5

337.4

4,629.0

West Seattle

3,627.9

445.2

217.9

795.9

199.9

973.4

200.0

2,296.3

1,031.6

9,788.1

Citywide Totals

18,465.3

3,173.4

2,829.9

2,611.9

1,440.8

4,811.1

3,312.0

14.031.6

3,137.5

53,813.5

 

Sources: King County Assessors Files, 1991; Seattle Planning Department GIS, 1993

*Transportation, Communications, and Utilities *** e.g., Cemeteries and Reservoirs

**Publicly-owned parks and dedicated open space **** Platted Streets and Sidewalks

Land Use Figure A-3

GENERALIZED*

EXISTING LAND USE

Note: Figure A-3, Generalized Existing Land Use, is omitted from this attachment because no amendments are proposed for Figure A-3; it is retained without amendment.

Land Use Figure A-4

NUMBER OF UNITS BY HOUSING TYPE BY DISTRICTS

(in Dwelling Units)

DISTRICT

Single

Family

 

Duplex

Triplex/

Four-plex

5 to 9 unit

Building

10 to 19 unit Building

20 to 49 unit

Building

50 or more

units

Mobile Home

 

Other

Total

Units

Ballard

12,990

1,433

1,346

1,939

1,461

1,080

310

8

273

20,567

Capitol Hill

5,393

550

910

1,696

4,439

7,349

5,027

3

283

25,640

Central

6,621

1,029

922

952

1,307

1,529

610

16

135

13,269

Downtown

56

32

80

236

524

2,554

5,237

3

210

8,857

Duwamish

9,396

1,002

853

605

1,037

700

302

57

143

14,162

Lake Union

5,580

1,041

1,180

2,273

2,377

1,113

69

8

471

13,784

North

9,881

271

433

855

1,264

1,704

2,421

35

146

17,335

Northeast

17,376

874

1,348

1,675

2,573

2,901

1,239

80

244

28,212

Northwest

17,594

1,149

1,231

1,727

2,796

2,382

1,494

442

237

29,059

Queen Anne

11,510

1,235

1,614

2,405

3,525

5,391

1,268

13

334

27,198

Southeast

12,134

555

550

651

994

930

699

9

166

16,856

West Seattle

23,799

1,320

1,683

1,622

2,123

2,596

544

20

220

33,873

Citywide Totals

132,300

10,491

12,150

16,636

24,420

30,229

19,220

694

2,862

249,032

 

Source: 1990 US Census

Land Use Figure A-5

1990 Household Density

 

 

Note: Figure A-5, 1990 Household Density, is omitted from this attachment because no amendments are proposed for Figure A-5; it is retained without amendment.

Land Use Figure A-6

1990 Population Density

Note: Figure A-6, 1990 Population Density, is omitted from this attachment because no amendments are proposed for Figure A-6; it is retained without amendment.

Employment Activity

Seattle is a regional employment center providing a great variety of jobs. Based on PSRC 1990 data, Seattle contains about 469,802 jobs in businesses occupying about 5,442 commercial and industrial acres, or 10% of the total city land area. Land Use Figure A-7 shows the distribution of these jobs according to standard classifications by neighborhood districts.

Employment Densities

Land Use Figure A-8 illustrates the distribution of employment density as number of jobs per gross acre. Areas with the highest job densities (greater than 50 jobs/gross acre) include Downtown, First Hill, Seattle Center and South Lake Union communities. Areas with a fairly high density (26 to 50 jobs/gross acre) are the University District, Ballard and Central areas. Predominantly residential areas of the city have employment densities as low as 1 to 15 jobs per acre.

Major Employment Concentrations

Employment activity is much more concentrated than housing. Most of the jobs in the city are located in the areas described below. These areas are unique because they attract people daily from all over the city and region.

Downtown. Downtown Seattle, with about 165,000 jobs at an average density of about 175 jobs per gross acre, supports the largest concentration of jobs in the Pacific Northwest. In some parts of the office core, job densities exceed 300 jobs per acre. Almost 37% of the total number of jobs in the city are located downtown.

University District. University District, with over 31,500 jobs, has the second greatest concentration of employment within the city. While much of this employment is associated with the University of Washington, the largest single employer in the city, the area also has significant amounts of both service and retail employment. Employment density in the University District is about 40 jobs per acre.

Northgate. In addition to Northgate Mall, the city’s principal regional shopping facility outside of downtown, several major employers are clustered in the Northgate area, including Northwest Hospital, North Seattle Community College and a relatively large concentration of service employment. This area has a total employment of about 11,366 jobs, at a density of about 28 jobs per acre.

Seattle Center. Another substantial concentration of employment located immediately north of downtown is the area around Seattle Center between Denny Way and the base of Queen Anne Hill. Providing backup office and service activity for downtown, as well as other retail and service uses, the area accommodates over 33,000 jobs at a job density of around 37 jobs per acre.

First Hill. A very specialized concentration of medical facilities has developed on First Hill east of downtown, lending the area the nickname "Pill Hill." With Swedish Hospital Medical Center, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Harborview Medical Center and related support facilities, this area has one of the greatest employment concentrations in the city, with around 20,000 jobs at an average employment density of about 85 jobs per acre.

Major Institutions. A number of major institutions located throughout the city also provide significant concentrations of employment for the whole region, such as the University of Washington. Others are somewhat isolated concentrations of employment in otherwise low-density areas, such as Veterans Administration Medical Center and South Seattle Community College.

Neighborhood Commercial. Seattle’s neighborhood business areas provide locations for services needed by the surrounding low- to moderate-residential populations, such as food from restaurants or grocery stores; entertainment; professional, personal or business services. These neighborhood businesses are dispersed and the range of services they provide varies throughout the city. They generally are in locations with fair accessibility to both the transportation network and concentrations of people.

A number of the city’s larger, more-established neighborhood commercial areas also provide concentrations of employment. Ballard, Fremont, and West Seattle Junction are all areas with between 3,000 and 6,000 jobs and employment densities averaging in the 10 to 20 jobs per acre range. Other commercial areas with notable job concentrations include Lake City, the Aurora strip between N. 125th and N.145th Streets and the area around Rainier Avenue and Interstate 90. The employment populations of these areas range between 3,000 and 4,000, with average job densities of between 8 to 12 jobs per acre. South Lake Union, in close proximity to Downtown, has over 15,000 jobs, reaching an employment density of 34 jobs per acre.

Industrial Areas. Citywide, industrial uses are concentrated in the Duwamish Valley, and North Seattle, which includes Interbay, and the shoreline area between Ballard and Fremont. Some manufacturing and industrial activity also occurs around the shores of Lake Union and along Rainier Avenue, near Interstate 90. Two of these areas, North Seattle and the Duwamish Valley, are major areas of employment. The North Seattle area has roughly 15,000 jobs, while the Duwamish accounts for over 65,000. Combined, they contain roughly 17% of the city’s total employment population. Given the land-intensive nature of employment activities in these areas, the job densities are comparatively low, seldom exceeding 14 jobs per acre.

Land Use Figure A-7

1990 EMPLOYMENT BY DISTRICTS

DISTRICT

Retail

F.I.R.E.*

Government

Education

W.C.T.U.**

Manufacturing

Total

Ballard

3,837

4,480

757

216

2,127

3,110

14,527

Capitol Hill

3,716

23,100

6,063

111

931

701

34,622

Central

971

12,219

1,039

214

897

1,931

17,271

Downtown

21,427

91,004

30,261

0

24,525

7,819

175,036

Duwamish

5,054

11,453

11,720

223

24,426

17,868

70,744

Lake Union

2,758

9,307

441

52

1,368

2,666

16,592

North

5,239

7,839

380

215

649

302

14,623

Northeast

6,421

11,681

22,318

242

698

610

41,970

Northwest

4,614

9,324

1,748

255

1,078

697

17,716

Queen Anne

4,762

17,048

4,149

437

8,654

4,658

39,708

Southeast

1,803

2,266

1,022

379

778

1,566

7,814

West Seattle

4,211

4,557

997

376

3,127

5,911

19,179

Citywide Totals

64,813

204,277

80,895

2,720

69,258

47,839

469,802

 

Source: Puget Sound Regional Council, Nov. 1993

*F.I.R.E. - Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate

**W.C.T.U. - Wholesale, Communications, Transportation, and Utilities

Land Use Figure A-8

Employment Density by

1990 Census Tract

Note: Figure A-8, Employment Density by 1990 Census Tract , is omitted from this attachment because no amendments are proposed for Figure A-8; it is retained without amendment.

Employment Distribution by Employment Sector

The distribution of jobs by employment sector in Seattle is shown in Land Use Figure A-9. Between 1980 and 1990, the number of jobs in Seattle increased by 21%, (83,118 new jobs). Service jobs accounted for the biggest increases, while manufacturing jobs have decreased by more than 5%.

LAND USE FIGURE A-9:

DISTRIBUTION OF JOBS BY EMPLOYMENT SECTOR

EMPLOYMENT SECTOR*

1980 % SHARE 1990 % SHARE % CHANGE

Mfg 50,536 13.1 47,839 10.0 -5

Retail 61,218 15.8 64,813 13.8 +6

WCTU 60,326 15.6 69,258 14.7 +15

FIRE/Serv 137,358 35.5 204,277 43.5 +49

Govt/Educ 77,246 20.0 83,615 17.8 +8

TOTAL 386,684 469,802 +21

Source: Forecasts of Seattle’s Population, Household, and Employment Characteristics for the Comprehensive Plan EIS Analysis, Seattle Planning Department, September 1992.

* Mfg = Manufacturing

WCTU = Wholesale, trade, transportation, communications, utilities

FIRE/Serv = Finance, insurance, real estate, services

Govt/Educ = Government, Education

LAND USE APPENDIX E:

Existing and Proposed Zoned Development Capacity

Summary

This appendix is an update of the Zoned Development Capacity report published by the Planning Department (formerly Office for Long-range Planning) in November 1991. Basic assumptions developed for the 1991 Capacity report are incorporated into this updated capacity analysis. This analysis provides a current calculation of zoned development capacity by using current existing conditions data and updated zoning.

Two sets of residential and non-residential estimated capacity calculations are presented. The first capacity calculations present the estimated development potential under existing zoning (Capacity I). A second set of capacity calculations (Capacity II) presents changes to estimated development capacity to reflect the proposed changes to zoning and development standards required to implement the Urban Village Strategy.

Definition. Development capacity is an amount of residential development (number of dwelling units) and non-residential development (building floor area) that could be built based on the zoning of the land and other factors limiting development. Generally, capacity is calculated by assuming a certain development is permitted based on allowable density as defined by the zoning. Other factors are considered such as the extent of existing development, existing uses, public ownership and the presence of streets, parks and greenbelts. Estimates do not take into account many factors which will influence actual development decisions, such as site constraints, availability of financing, and consumer demand or the capacity of the infrastructure, including roads and utilities. However, consideration has been given to the likelihood of redevelopment based on existing improvements to the site.

Data Source. The primary data source for calculating capacity is the King County Department of Assessor's property records on existing conditions including number of units and assessed valuation. City of Seattle Geographic Information System data were used for land area and zoning data.

CAPACITY METHODOLO of selecting parcels is the same. The following lists the areas with different assumptions incorporated as part of the capacity II analysis.

• Applied proposed residential density limits to mixed-use development in commercial zones located outside Urban Villages and to C-1 zones inside of urban villages. Additional capacity was calculated for C-1 zones inside villages based on the new option to build to NC3 standards, but not included in Land Use Figure A-13 below (see footnotes);

• Applied a proposed floor area ratio to office uses in all general commercial zones located inside and outside of Urban Villages (Additional office capacity was calculated for general commercial zones inside villages based on the option to build to NC-3 standards, but not included in Land Use Figure A-14 (see footnotes);

• Parcels in all commercial zones except C-2 were divided, with 50 percent allocated to housing and 50 percent allocated to non-residential square footage. Parcels in C-2 zones were all allocated to non-residential use;

• Capacity of approximately 57 acres of Lowrise 3 land was reduced by 500 units to reflect recommended rezoning;

• Parcels in the Northgate Comprehensive Plan area and Southeast Seattle Redevelopment Area were assumed to develop according to provisions in those plans;

• In the Pike/Pine area, some NC3 zoned land was assumed to be rezoned to the new NC/R classification, which would increase the amount of residential development allowed in single-use residential buildings and decrease the amount of non-residential capacity. Three-quarters of such parcels were assigned residential uses and one-quarter non-residential.

Several of the assumptions of this analysis serve to understate actual capacity, providing a margin for error to assure that sufficient capacity exists:

a. No additional residential capacity above the proposed base density limit is assumed for the C-1 zones in urban villages, where a greater density limit is permitted if neighborhood commercial development and use standards are followed;

b. It is assumed that no residential development will take place in C-2 zones where residential use is a conditional use. However, in villages mixed-use is to be encouraged and C-2, like C-1 can be developed conditionally to neighborhood commercial residential densities;

c. The typical jobs per acre ratio for industrial uses is assumed for development of industrial land, although some commercial uses with a higher jobs per acre ratio are allowed.

Land Use Figure A-13 compares the estimated existing housing capacity (Capacity I) with the estimated comprehensive plan housing capacity (Capacity II) reflecting the urban village strategy. Capacity II shows an estimated decrease in capacity of about 8%, about 8,560 housing units under the most limiting assumptions. If developers take

advantage of the option to develop C-1 or C-2 zoned property to neighborhood commercial zone standards in urban villages up to 3,950 more dwelling units could be added under comprehensive plan capacity.

Land Use Figure A-13

Comparison of Estimated Potential Units

Under Existing and Proposed Urban Village Strategy by Zoning Category

Zoning Category

Capacity I (Existing Zoning)

Capacity II (Comprehensive Plan Zoning)

Single-Family

13,160

13,160

Multifamily

46,680

46,180

Commercial

29,360

21,300

Downtown

24,440

24,440

Total

113,640

105,080

Source: Calculations by Seattle Planning Department, 1994

Land Use Figure A-14 compares the estimated Capacity I non-residential floor area with the estimated adjusted and Capacity II floor area reflecting the Urban Village strategy. As above Capacity II estimates show the revised capacity assuming regulations anticipated under the comprehensive plan. An estimated 8.7 million fewer square feet could be added under the Capacity II assumptions, in commercial zones than under existing capacity, using limiting assumptions. If the option to develop land zoned C-1 or C-2 to neighborhood commercial zone standards within urban villages is used, up to an additional 8.7 million square feet could be built, accommodating about 29,000 additional jobs.

Land Use Figure A-14

Comparison of Estimated Potential Floor Area (jobs)

Under Existing and Proposed Urban Village Strategy by Zoning Category

Zoning Category

Capacity I (Existing Zoning)

Capacity II (Comprehensive Plan Zoning)

Commercial

46.2 (154,000 jobs)

27.9 (93,000 jobs)

Downtown

28.0 (101,700 jobs)

28.0 (101,700 jobs)

Industrial

39.2 (87,000 jobs)

39.2 (87,000 jobs)

Total

113.4 (342,700 jobs)

95.1 (281,700 jobs)

* Number of potential jobs is calculated using the following floor area to employee ratio: Commercial zones at 300 sq ft/employee, Downtown zoned at 275 sq ft/employee, and Industrial zones at 450 sq ft/employee.

LAND USE APPENDIX DF

Growth Management Projections for the City of Seattle

(Adopted 7/96)

The following annual population and employment projections reflect the City’s 20 year population and employment growth assumptions. These figures are projections, or what is predicted to occur over the life of the Plan. Growth estimates reflect Washington State estimates of actual housing growth as of April 1 of each year. These figures will be revised periodically to reflect changes in assumptions and/or actual growth.

Resident Population and Housing and Households Growth Projections Employment Growth Projections

 

Year

Resident

Projected

Population

Estimated

Population

 

Projected

Households

Estimated

Housing

Units

Average

Household

Size

 

Projected

Employment

1994

527,200

531,400

 

245,400

259,000

2.06

 

549,400

1995

526,900

532,900

 

246,300

259,900

2.05

 

554,600

1996

527,600

534,700

 

247,600

260,900

2.04

 

560,400

1997

528,400

536,600

 

249,000

262,000

2.04

 

568,000

1998

529,900

539,700

 

250,900

264,400

2.03

 

576,800

1999

532,200

540,500

 

253,100

266,100

2.02

 

586,400

2000

536,000

540,900

 

256,100

269,100

2.01

 

597,400

2001

541,100

   

260,100

 

2.00

 

607,000

2002

546,200

   

264,000

 

1.98

 

616,000

2003

549,800

   

267,000

 

1.98

 

623,700

2004

552,700

   

269,600

 

1.97

 

629,100

2005

556,000

   

272,300

 

1.96

 

634,200

2006

559,600

   

275,400

 

1.95

 

640,300

2007

564,600

   

279,100

 

1.94

 

647,100

2008

569,400

   

282,900

 

1.93

 

654,100

2009

573,700

   

286,400

 

1.92

 

661,100

2010

578,100

   

289,800

 

1.91

 

668,100

2011

582,600

   

293,400

 

1.91

 

674,300

2012

587,400

   

297,100

 

1.90

 

681,100

2013

592,600

   

301,200

 

1.89

 

688,700

2014

598,400

   

305,700

 

1.88

 

696,900

Sources: Growth Management Act Projections for the City of Seattle; Dick Conway and Associates, October 1993

April 1 Population of Cities, Towns, and Counties Used for the Allocation of Designated State Revenues; State of Washington, Office of Financial Management, Forecasting Division, June 2000

Total Housing Units 1990 through 2000; State of Washington, Office of Financial Management, Forecasting Division, July 2000

 

 

 

APPENDIX E:

City Open Space and Recreation Facility Goals

City Open Space

Goal

Area

Breathing Room Open Space

1 Acre per 100 residents

Citywide

Usable Open Space

¼ to ½ acre within ¼ to ½ mile of every resident

Areas outside Urban Villages

Recreation Facilities

Specific Goals for Recreation Facilities such as Community Centers, swimming pools and athletic fields are contained in the Parks Comprehensive Plan

Citywide, except as modified by Village Open Space and Recreation Goals

 

URBAN VILLAGE OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION FACILITY GOALS

Goal

Urban Center Villages

Hub Urban Villages

Residential Urban Villages

Urban Village Open Space Population-based Goals

One acre of Village Open Space per 1,000 households.

For the downtown core one acre of Village Open Space per 10,000 jobs.

One acre of Village Open Space per 1,000 households.

Same as for Hub Urban Villages.

Urban Village Open Space Distribution Goals

All locations in the village within approximately 1/8 mile of Village Open Space.

Same as for Urban Center Villages.

For moderate and high density areas: All locations within 1/8 mile of a Village Open Space that is between 1/4- and 1-acre in size, or within 1/4 mile of a Village Open Space that is greater than 1 acre.

For low density areas: All locations within 1/4 mile of any qualifying Village Open Space.

Qualifying Criteria for Village Open Space

Dedicated open spaces of at least 10,000 square feet in size, publicly accessible, and usable for recreation and social activities.

Same as for Urban Center Villages.

Same as for Urban Center and Hub Villages.

Village Commons, Recreation Facility and Community Garden Goals

At least one usable open space of at least one acre in size (Village Commons) where the existing and target households total 2,500 or more. (Amended 11/96)

One indoor, multiple-use recreation facility serving each Urban Center.

One dedicated community garden for each 2,500 households in the Village with at least one dedicated garden site.

At least one usable open space of at least one acre in size (Village Commons).

One facility for indoor public assembly.

Same as for Urban Center Villages.

At least one usable open space of at least one acre in size (Village Commons) where overall residential density is 10 households per gross acre or more.

One facility for indoor public assembly in Villages with greater than 2,000 households.

Same as for Urban Center and Hub Villages.