Seattle City Council Bills and Ordinances
Information modified on October 30, 2017; retrieved on April 26, 2024 7:44 PM
Ordinance 125114
Introduced as Council Bill 118755
Title | |
---|---|
AN ORDINANCE relating to the Open Housing Ordinance; adding antidiscrimination protections based on a renters’ use of a subsidy or verifiable alternative source of income; adding a first-in-time policy; prohibiting preferred employer programs; adding Section 14.08.050 to, and amending Sections 14.08.015, 14.08.020, 14.08.040, 14.08.045, 14.08.060, 14.08.070 and 14.08.190 of, the Seattle Municipal Code. |
Description and Background | |
---|---|
Current Status: | Passed as Amended |
Fiscal Note: | Fiscal Note to Council Bill No. 118755 |
Legislative History | |
---|---|
Sponsor: | Lisa Herbold | tr>
Date Introduced: | August 1, 2016 |
Committee Referral: | Full Council |
City Council Action Date: | August 8, 2016 |
City Council Action: | Passed |
City Council Vote: | 8-0 (Excused: Sawant) |
Date Delivered to Mayor: | August 16, 2016 |
Date Signed by Mayor: (About the signature date) | August 17, 2016 |
Date Filed with Clerk: | August 17, 2016 |
Signed Copy: | PDF scan of Ordinance No. 125114 |
Text | |
---|---|
CITY OF SEATTLE
ORDINANCE __________________
COUNCIL BILL __________________ AN ORDINANCE relating to the Open Housing Ordinance; adding antidiscrimination protections based on a renters’ use of a subsidy or verifiable alternative source of income; adding a first-in-time policy; prohibiting preferred employer programs; adding Section 14.08.050 to, and amending Sections 14.08.015, 14.08.020, 14.08.040, 14.08.045, 14.08.060, 14.08.070 and 14.08.190 of, the Seattle Municipal Code. WHEREAS, in September 2014 the Council adopted Resolution 31546, in which the Mayor and Council jointly convened the Seattle Housing Affordability and Livability Agenda (HALA) Advisory Committee to evaluate potential strategies to make Seattle more affordable, equitable, and inclusive; in particular to promote the development and preservation of affordable housing for residents of the City; and WHEREAS, in July 2015, HALA published its Final Advisory Committee Recommendations and the Mayor published Housing Seattle: A Roadmap to an Affordable and Livable City, which outlines a multi-prong approach of bold and innovative solutions to address Seattle’s housing affordability crisis; and WHEREAS, in October 2015 Council proposed and adopted, with the Mayor concurring, Resolution 31622 declaring the City’s intent to expeditiously consider strategies recommended by the HALA Advisory Committee; and WHEREAS, in 2015 the HALA Advisory Committee recommended the City develop legislation to remove barriers based on income type and the Mayor included this recommendation in his Action Plan to address Seattle’s Housing Affordability Crisis; and WHEREAS, for over 25 years, the City of Seattle has protected a person’s right to housing using a Section 8 housing voucher (Seattle Municipal Code Chapter 14.08); and WHEREAS, Seattle’s protection of a person’s right to housing using a Section 8 housing voucher was unanimously passed in 1989 in response to the housing affordability crisis, at the time when between 3,000 and 5,000 people a night were experiencing homelessness and thousands more faced rental restrictions due to their use of the U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs that helped offset their rent payments. Many of them were elderly, disabled, or low-income people of color; and WHEREAS, in the last eight years, ten percent of housing discrimination cases investigated by the Seattle Office for Civil Rights involved denial based on a Section 8 housing voucher; and WHEREAS, due to existing racial inequities, people of color face disproportionate rates of poverty and are overrepresented as Section 8 voucher holders in Seattle. African Americans, Native Americans, and Asian Pacific Islanders are doubly represented as voucher holders compared to their total proportion of the Seattle population, meaning that discrimination on the basis of a Section 8 voucher has a disproportionate impact on communities of color; and WHEREAS, in 2016 Seattle continues to face a challenge of housing affordability, with individuals and families experiencing a denial of housing based on their use of subsidies and verifiable alternative sources of income such as child support payments, Social Security, Supplemental Security Income, unemployment insurance, short-term rental assistance, or veteran’s benefits; and WHEREAS, communities of color, people with disabilities, parents, and others who are disproportionately impacted by Section 8 discrimination are also impacted by a denial of housing based on the use of other subsidies and alternative sources of income to pay their rent; and WHEREAS, furthering fair housing for all Seattle’s residents is an affirmation of The City of Seattle’s longstanding commitment to race and social justice; and WHEREAS, the first-in-time policy will not apply to single-family dwellings including accessory dwelling units wherein the owner or person entitled to possession maintains a permanent residence, as described in 14.08.190.A; and WHEREAS, the City convened a diverse group of stakeholders comprised of landlords, nonprofit housing providers, social service agencies, and tenant advocates to review the issue and provide input on legislation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 14.08.015 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 123014, is amended as follows:
14.08.015 Seattle Open Housing Poster ((
All persons required to post a fair housing poster pursuant to 24 CFR 110 shall also post a Seattle Open Housing Poster at the same locations required in the federal regulation. A person who fails to post a Seattle Open Housing Poster as required in
this section is subject to a fine of (( Section 2. Section 14.08.020 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 124829, is amended as follows:
14.08.020 Definitions ((
Definitions as used in this ((
((
1. Claims to have been injured by an unfair practice prohibited by this ((
2. Believes that he or she will be injured by an unfair practice prohibited by this (( “Alternative source of income” means lawful, verifiable income derived from sources other than wages, salaries, or other compensation for employment. It includes but is not limited to monies derived from Social Security benefits, supplemental security income, unemployment benefits, other retirement programs, child support, the Aged, Blind or Disabled Cash Assistance Program, Refugee Cash Assistance, and any federal, state, local government, private, or nonprofit-administered benefit program.
((
((
((
((
((
((
((
((
((
((
((
((
((
((
((
((
“Ensuring meaningful access” means the ability of a person with limited English proficiency to use or obtain language assistance services or resources to understand and communicate effectively, including, but not limited to,
translation or interpretation services.
((
“Housing costs” means the compensation or fees paid or charged, usually periodically, for the use of any housing unit. “Housing costs” include the basic rent charge and any periodic or monthly fees for other services paid
to the owner by the occupant, but do not include utility charges that are based on usage and that the occupant has agreed in the rental agreement to pay, unless the obligation to pay those charges is itself a change in the terms of the rental
agreement.
((
((
((
((
((
((
((
“Preferred employer program” means any policy or practice in which a person provides different terms and conditions, including but not limited to discounts or waiver of fees or deposits, in connection with renting, leasing, or
subleasing real property to a prospective occupant because the prospective occupant is employed by a specific employer. “Preferred employer program” does not include different terms and conditions provided in city-funded housing or other
publicly funded housing, for the benefit of city or public employees, housing specifically designated as employer housing which is owned or operated by an employer and leased for the benefit of its employees only, or any program affirmatively furthering
fair housing. For purposes of this definition, “affirmatively furthering fair housing” means assisting homeless persons to obtain appropriate housing and assisting persons at risk of becoming homeless; retention of the affordable housing
stock; and increasing the availability of permanent housing in standard condition and affordable cost to low-income and moderate-income families, particularly to members of disadvantaged minorities, without discrimination on the basis of race, color,
creed, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, gender identity, political ideology, honorably discharged veteran or military status, alternative source of income, participation in a Section 8
program or other subsidy program, the presence of any disability or the use of a service animal by a disabled person. “Affirmatively furthering fair housing” also means increasing the supply of supportive housing, which combines structural
features and services needed to enable persons with special needs, including persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, to live with dignity and independence; and providing housing affordable to low-income persons accessible to job opportunities.
((
((
((
((
(( 1. The making or purchasing of loans or providing other financial assistance: a. For purchasing, constructing, improving, repairing, or maintaining real property, or b. Secured by real property; or 2. The selling, brokering, or appraising of real property; or 3. The insuring of real property, mortgages, or the issuance of insurance related to any real estate transaction.
((
((
((
((
((
((
“ Verifiable” means the source of income can be confirmed as to its amount or receipt.
1. A veteran, as defined in RCW 41.04.007; or 2. An active or reserve member in any branch of the armed forces of the United States, including the national guard, coast guard, and armed forces reserves. Section 3. Section 14.08.040 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 121593, is amended as follows:
14.08.040 Unfair practices-Generally (( A. It is an unfair practice for any person to discriminate by: 1. Undertaking or refusing to engage in a real estate transaction or otherwise deny or withhold such real property; or 2. Refusing to negotiate a real estate transaction; or 3. Representing that such real property is not available for inspection, sale, rental, or lease when in fact it is so available; or 4. Expelling or evicting an occupant from real property or otherwise making unavailable or denying a dwelling; or
5. Applying different terms, conditions , or privileges of a real estate transaction, including but not limited to the setting of rates for rental or lease, (( B. It is an unfair practice for any real estate broker, real estate agent, salesperson, or employee to discriminate by: 1. Refusing or intentionally failing to list real property for sale, rent, or lease; or 2. Refusing or intentionally failing to show real property listed for sale, rental, or lease; or 3. Refusing or intentionally failing to accept and/or transmit any reasonable offer to purchase, lease, or rent real property. C. It is an unfair practice to discriminate by denying a person access to, or membership or participation in, a multiple listing service or real estate brokers’ organization or other service, or to discriminate in the terms and conditions of such access, membership, or participation. D. It is an unfair practice to prohibit reasonable modifications needed by a disabled tenant. Whether or not the landlord permits tenants in general to make alterations or additions to a structure or fixtures, it is an unfair practice for a landlord to refuse to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford a disabled person equal opportunity to use and enjoy any dwelling, or to refuse to allow a person to make alterations or additions to existing premises occupied or to be occupied by a disabled person which are necessary to make the rental property accessible by disabled persons, under the following conditions: 1. The landlord is not required to pay for the alterations, additions, or restoration unless otherwise required by federal law; 2. The landlord has the right to demand assurances that all modifications will be performed pursuant to local permit requirements, in a professional manner, and in accordance with applicable building codes; 3. The landlord may, where it is reasonable to do so, condition permission for modification on the tenant’s agreement to restore the interior of the premises to its pre-existing condition, reasonable wear and tear excepted.
E. It is an unfair practice under this chapter for any person to design or construct a building or structure that does not conform with 42 U.S.C. ((
F. It is an unfair practice for an owner or lessor of real property, when determining tenant eligibility for purposes of leasing, subleasing, or renting real property, to apply income screening criteria (such as an income to rent ratio) in a
manner inconsistent with the following:
1. Any payment from a Section 8 or other subsidy program that reduces the amount of rent for which the tenant is responsible must be subtracted from the total of the monthly rent.
2. All sources of income must be included as a part of the tenant’s total income except in situations where the rental housing unit is subject to income and/or rent restrictions in a housing regulatory agreement or subsidy agreement and income is
determined pursuant to the agreement.
G. For purposes of applying the definitions of “discriminate” and “discrimination” in Section 14.08.020 to this Section 14.08.040, “discrimination” only includes “alternative source of income” when
referring to a person leasing, subleasing, or renting real property or who seeks to lease, sublease, or rent real property.
H. It is an unfair practice for a person to fail to:
a. By itself or in combination with: other payments from a Section 8 or other subsidy program, and any verifiable source of income including but not limited to wages, salaries, or other compensation for employment, and all alternative sources of income,
the written pledge or commitment is sufficient to allow the occupant to become current on all housing costs, and court costs or reasonable attorney’s fees already incurred and directly related to the recovery of the unpaid housing costs lawfully
owed once the pledge or commitment is fulfilled.
b. The written pledge or commitment is received by the owner at any time prior to:
1) The issuance of a notice served under RCW 59.12.030(3) or (4) or 59.04.040; or
2) The end of the time period allowed for compliance in notice served under RCW 59.12.030(3) or (4) or 59.04.040.
c. The written pledge or commitment does not commit the owner to any conditions, including any agreement not to pursue future unlawful detainer actions, except those requiring the owner to timely provide any information necessary for payment.
d. The Section 8 or other subsidy program provider commits to paying the written pledge or commitment to the owner within five business days of issuing the written pledge or commitment to the owner. The payment shall be made directly from the Section 8
or other subsidy program provider to the owner, where possible.
I. It is an unfair practice to advertise, institute, or maintain a preferred employer program. Any preferred employer program that is part of an unexpired rental agreement upon the effective date of the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 118755 may
continue until the occupant vacates the unit and the rental agreement is terminated.
J. Short-term voucher evaluation
The Department shall ask the City Auditor to conduct an evaluation of the impact of the amendment to the definition of “Section 8 program” in subsection 14.08.020 (effective on the date of the ordinance introduced as Council Bill 118755) to
include short-term assistance to determine if the addition of short-term assistance to the definition should be maintained, amended, or repealed. The evaluation should include an analysis of the impact on the ability of tenants to enter into and
successfully remain in housing and the impact on the rate of eviction. The City Auditor, at their discretion, may retain an independent, outside party to conduct the evaluation. The evaluation shall be submitted to the City Council by the end of 2018.
Section 4. Subsection 14.08.045.B of the Seattle Municipal Code, which section was last amended by Ordinance 123014, is amended as follows: 14.08.045 Retaliation, harassment, or coercion.
* * * B. It is an unfair practice for any person, whether or not acting for profit, to harass, intimidate, discriminate against , or otherwise abuse any person or person’s friends or associates because of race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, gender identity, political ideology, honorably discharged veteran or military status, alternative source of income, participation in a Section 8 or other subsidy program, the presence of any disability, or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a disabled person with the purpose or effect of denying to such person the rights granted in this chapter or the right to quiet or peaceful possession or enjoyment of any real property.
* * * Section 5. A new Section 14.08.050 is added to the Seattle Municipal Code as follows: 14.08.050 First-in-time A. Effective January 1, 2017, it is an unfair practice for a person to fail to: 1. provide notice to a prospective occupant, in writing or by posting in the office of the person leasing the unit or in the building where the unit is physically located and, if existing, on the website advertising rental of the unit, in addition to and at the same time as providing the information required by RCW 59.18.257(1), of: a. the criteria the owner will use to screen prospective occupants and the minimum threshold for each criterion that the potential occupant must meet to move forward in the application process; including any different or additional criteria that will be used if the owner chooses to conduct an individualized assessment related to criminal records. b. all information, documentation, and other submissions necessary for the owner to conduct screening using the criteria stated in the notice required in subsection 14.08.050.A.1.a. A rental application is considered complete when it includes all the information, documentation, and other submissions stated in the notice required in this subsection 14.08.050.A.1.b. Lack of a material omission in the application by a prospective occupant will not render the application incomplete. c. information explaining how to request additional time to complete an application to either ensure meaningful access to the application or a reasonable accommodation and how fulfilling the request impacts the application receipt date, pursuant to subsection 14.08.050.B and C. d. the applicability to the available unit of the exceptions stated in subsections 14.08.050.A.4.a and b. 2. note the date and time of when the owner receives a completed rental application, whether submitted through the mail, electronically, or in person. 3. screen completed rental applications in chronological order as required in subsection 14.08.050.A.2 to determine whether a prospective occupant meets all the screening criteria that are necessary for approval of the application. If, after conducting the screening, the owner needs more information than was stated in the notice required in subsection 14.08.050.A.1.b to determine whether to approve the application or takes an adverse action as described in RCW 59.18.257(1)(c) or decides to conduct an individualized assessment, the application shall not be rendered incomplete. The owner shall notify the prospective occupant in writing, by phone, or in person of what additional information is needed, and the specified period of time (at least 72 hours) that the prospective occupant has to provide the additional information. The owner’s failure to provide the notice required in this subsection 14.08.050.A.3 does not affect the prospective occupant’s right to 72 hours to provide additional information. If the additional information is provided within the specified period of time, the original submission date of the completed application for purposes of determining the chronological order of receipt will not be affected. If the information is not provided by the end of the specified period of time, the owner may consider the application incomplete or reject the application. 4. offer tenancy of the available unit to the first prospective occupant meeting all the screening criteria necessary for approval of the application. If the first approved prospective occupant does not accept the offer of tenancy for the available unit within 48 hours of when the offer is made, the owner shall review the next completed rental application in chronological order until a prospective occupant accepts the owner’s offer of tenancy. This subsection 14.08.050.A.4 does not apply when the owner: a. is legally obligated to set aside the available unit to serve specific vulnerable populations; b. voluntarily agrees to set aside the available unit to serve specific vulnerable populations, including but not limited to homeless persons, survivors of domestic violence, persons with low income, and persons referred to the owner by non-profit organizations or social service agencies. B. If a prospective occupant requires additional time to submit a complete rental application because of the need to ensure meaningful access to the application or for a reasonable accommodation, the prospective occupant must make a request to the owner. The owner shall document the date and time of the request and it will serve as the date and time of receipt for purposes of determining the chronological order of receipt pursuant to subsection 14.08.050.A.2. The owner shall not unreasonably deny a request for additional time. If the request for additional time is denied, the date and time of receipt of the complete application shall serve as the date and time of receipt pursuant to subsection 14.08.050.A.2. This subsection 14.08.050.B does not diminish or otherwise affect any duty of an owner under local, state, or federal law to grant a reasonable accommodation to an individual with a disability. C. To maintain the prospective occupant’s chronological position noted at the time of notice, the owner may require that the prospective occupant provide reasonable documentation of the need for additional time to ensure meaningful access along with the completed application. The owner must notify the prospective occupant at the time the owner grants any request for additional time if the owner will require submission of reasonable documentation. If such notice is given and reasonable documentation is not provided with the completed application, the owner may change the date and time of receipt from when the request was made to the date and time the complete application is submitted. This subsection 14.08.050.C applies only to requests for additional time based on the need to ensure meaningful access to the application. It does not apply to requests for reasonable accommodation. D. First-in-time evaluation The Department shall ask the City Auditor to conduct an evaluation of the impact of the program described in subsections 14.08.050.A-C to determine if the program should be maintained, amended, or repealed. The evaluation shall only be conducted on the basis of the program’s impacts after 18 months of implementation. The evaluation should include an analysis of the impact on discrimination based on a protected class and impact on the ability of low-income persons and persons with limited English proficiency to obtain housing. The City Auditor, at their discretion, may retain an independent, outside party to conduct the evaluation. The evaluation shall be submitted to the City Council by the end of 2018. Section 6. Section 14.08.060 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 121593, is amended as follows:
14.08.060 Discrimination in real estate-related transactions (( It is an unfair practice for any lender, or any agent or employee thereof, to whom application is made for financial assistance for the purchase, lease, acquisition, construction, rehabilitation, repair, or maintenance of any real property, or any other person whose business includes engaging in real estate related transactions, to: A. Discriminate against any person, prospective occupant , or occupant of real property in the granting, withholding, extending, making available, modifying , or renewing, or in the rates, terms, conditions , or privileges of a real estate related transaction, or in the extension of services in connection therewith; or B. Discriminate by using any form of application for a real estate related transaction or making any record of inquiry in connection with applications for a real estate related transaction which expresses, directly or indirectly, an intent to discriminate unless required or authorized by local, state , or federal laws or agencies to prevent discrimination in real property; provided that, nothing in this provision shall prohibit any party to a credit transaction from requesting designation of marital status for the purpose of considering application of community property law to the individual case or from taking reasonable action thereon or from requesting information regarding age, parental status, or participation in a Section 8 or other subsidy program when such information is necessary to determine the applicant’s ability to repay the loan. Section 7. Section 14.08.070 of the Seattle Municipal Code, last amended by Ordinance 123527, is amended as follows:
14.08.070 Unfair inquiries or advertisements (( It is an unfair practice for any person to: A. Require any information, make or keep any record, or use any form of application containing questions or inquiries concerning race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, gender identity, political ideology, honorably discharged veteran or military status, participation in a Section 8 or other subsidy program, the presence of a disability, or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a disabled person in connection with a real estate transaction unless used solely: 1. For making reports required by agencies of the federal, state , or local government to prevent and eliminate discrimination or to overcome its effects or for other purposes authorized by federal, state , or local agencies or laws or rules adopted thereunder, 2. As to “marital status,” for the purpose of determining applicability of community property law to the individual case, or
3. As to “age,” for the purpose of determining that the applicant has attained the age of majority, or in the case of housing exclusively for older persons as described in (( B. Publish, print, circulate, issue , or display , or cause to be published, printed, circulated, issued , or displayed, any communication, notice, advertisement, statement, or sign of any kind relating to a real estate transaction or listing of real property which indicates directly or indicates an intention to make any preference, limitation , or specification based on race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, gender identity, political ideology, honorably discharged veteran or military status, alternative source of income, the participation in a Section 8 or other subsidy program, the presence of a disability, or the use of a service animal by a disabled person. Section 8. Section 14.08.190 of the Seattle Municipal Code, which was last amended by Ordinance 123014, are amended as follows: 14.08.190 Exclusions. Nothing in this chapter shall:
* * * B. Be interpreted to prohibit any person from making a choice among prospective purchasers or tenants of real property on the basis of factors other than race, color, creed, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, marital status, parental status, sexual orientation, gender identity, political ideology, honorably discharged veteran or military status, alternative source of income, participation in a Section 8 or other subsidy program, the presence of any disability, or the use of a trained dog guide or service animal by a disabled person where such factors are not designed, intended or used to discriminate;
* * *
J. Prohibit any person from limiting the rental or occupancy of a dwelling based on the use of force or violent behavior by an occupant or prospective occupant, including behavior intended to produce or incite imminent force or violence to the person or
property of the owner, manager, or other agent of the owner ((
K. Be interpreted to restrict a person’s obligation or ability to lease or sell real property that has been designated for certain types of tenants or purchasers as part of a government sponsored or legally required low-income housing
program or policy, subsidy, voucher, or tax-related program for the provision of affordable housing, to such tenants intended to be served or benefited by such designation or program.
* * * Section 9. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force 30 days after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Seattle Municipal Code Section 1.04.020. Passed by the City Council the ____ day of ________________________, 2016, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of ___________________, 2016. ____________________________________ President __________ of the City Council Approved by me this ____ day of _____________________, 2016. ____________________________________ Edward B. Murray, Mayor Filed by me this ____ day of __________________________, 2016. ____________________________________ Monica Martinez Simmons, City Clerk (Seal) |
Attachments | |
---|---|