Seattle City Council Bills and Ordinances
Information modified on March 8, 2005; retrieved on May 22, 2025 10:38 PM
Ordinance 119896
Introduced as Council Bill 113120
Title | |
---|---|
AN ORDINANCE relating to enforcement of the Housing and Building Maintenance Code and the Land Use Code, making procedural modifications and corrections thereto, amending Sections 22.207.004, 22.207.006, 22.207.010, 22.207.012, 23.91.004, 23.91.006, 23.91.010 and 23.91.012 of the Seattle Municipal Code. |
Description and Background | |
---|---|
Current Status: | Passed |
Index Terms: | CODE-ENFORCEMENT, ADMINISTRATIVE-PROCEDURES, HOUSING, HEARING-EXAMINER, DEPARTMENT-OF-DESIGN-CONSTRUCTION-AND-LAND-USE, LAND-USE-CODE |
References: | Amending: Ord 119509, 119473 |
Legislative History | |
---|---|
Sponsor: | NICASTRO | tr>
Date Introduced: | March 6, 2000 |
Committee Referral: | Landlord/Tenant and Land Use |
City Council Action Date: | March 27, 2000 |
City Council Action: | Passed |
City Council Vote: | 7-0 (Excused: Drago, McIver) |
Date Delivered to Mayor: | March 28, 2000 |
Date Signed by Mayor: (About the signature date) | March 31, 2000 |
Date Filed with Clerk: | March 31, 2000 |
Signed Copy: | PDF scan of Ordinance No. 119896 |
Text | |
---|---|
ORDINANCE ____________ AN ORDINANCE relating to enforcement of the Housing and Building Maintenance Code and the Land Use Code, making procedural modifications and corrections thereto, amending Sections 22.207.004, 22.207.006, 22.207.010, 22.207.012, 23.91.004, 23.91.006, 23.91.010 and 23.91.012 of the Seattle Municipal Code. WHEREAS the Washington land use petition act (RCW 36.70C) sets forth requirements for judicial review of land use decisions by local jurisdictions; WHEREAS the decisions of the Seattle Hearing Examiner issued pursuant to SMC 22.207.012 and SMC 23.91.012 are land use decisions as defined in RCW 36.70C.020; and WHEREAS minor procedural changes are needed and Ordinance 119509 contained minor errors that need correction. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SEATTLE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 22.207.004 of the Seattle Municipal Code, which was adopted by Ordinance 119509, is amended as follows: SMC 22.207.004 Citation.
A. Citation. If after investigation the Director determines that the standards or requirements of provisions referenced in Section 22.207.002 have been violated, the Director may issue a citation to the owner and/or other person or entity responsible
for the violation. The citation shall include the following information
B. Service. The citation may be served by personal service in the manner set forth in RCW 4.28.080 for service of a summons or sent by first class mail, addressed to the last known address of such person(s). Service shall be complete at the time of
personal service, or if mailed, on the date of mailing Section 2. Section 22.207.006 of the Seattle Municipal Code, which was adopted by Ordinance 119509, is amended as follows: SMC 22.207.006 Response to citations.
A. A
1
2
3
B. A response to a citation must be received by the Office of the Hearing Examiner no later than eighteen (18) days after the date the citation is served. When the last day of the appeal period so computed is a Saturday, Sunday, or federal or
City holiday, the period shall run until 5:00 p.m. on the next business day.
22.207.010 Mitigation hearings. A. Date and Notice. If a person requests a mitigation hearing, the mitigation hearing shall be held within thirty (30) days after written response to the citation requesting such hearing is received by the Hearing Examiner. Notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing will be sent by first class mail to the address provided in the request for hearing not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. B. Procedure at Hearing. The Hearing Examiner shall hold an informal hearing, which shall not be governed by the Rules of Evidence. The person cited may present witnesses, but witnesses may not be compelled to attend. A representative from DCLU may also be present and may present additional information, but attendance by a representative from DCLU is not required.
C. Disposition. The Hearing Examiner shall determine whether the person's explanation justifies reduction of the monetary penalty; however, the monetary penalty may not be reduced unless D. Entry of Order. After hearing the explanation of the person cited and any other information presented at the hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall enter an order finding that the person cited committed the violation and assessing a monetary penalty in an amount determined pursuant to this section. The Hearing Examiner's decision is the final decision of the City on this matter. Section 4. Section 22.207.012 of the Seattle Municipal Code, which was adopted by Ordinance 119509, is amended as follows: 22.207.012 Contested case hearing. A. Date and Notice. If a person requests a contested case hearing, the hearing shall be held within sixty (60) days after the written response to the citation requesting such hearing is received. B. Hearing. Contested case hearings shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures for hearing contested cases contained in Section 3.02.090 and the rules adopted by the Hearing Examiner for hearing contested cases, except as modified by this section. The issues heard at the hearing shall be limited to those raised in writing in the response to the citation and that are within the jurisdiction of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner may issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents. C. Sufficiency. No citation shall be deemed insufficient for failure to contain a detailed statement of the facts constituting the specific violation which the person cited is alleged to have committed or by reason of defects or imperfections, provided such lack of detail, or defects or imperfections do not prejudice substantial rights of the person cited. D. Amendment of Citation. A citation may be amended prior to the conclusion of the hearing to conform to the evidence presented if substantial rights of the person cited are not thereby prejudiced. E. Evidence at Hearing. The certified statement or declaration authorized by RCW 9A.72.085 submitted by an inspector shall be prima facie evidence that a violation occurred and that the person cited is responsible. The certified statement or declaration of the inspector authorized under RCW 9A.72.085 and any other evidence accompanying the report shall be admissible without further evidentiary foundation. Any certifications or declarations authorized under RCW 9A.72.085 shall also be admissible without further evidentiary foundation. The person cited may rebut the DCLU evidence and establish that the cited violation(s) did not occur or that the person contesting the citation is not responsible for the violation. F. Disposition. If the citation is sustained at the hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall enter an order finding that the person cited committed the violation. If the violation remains uncorrected, the Hearing Examiner shall impose the applicable penalty. The Hearing Examiner may reduce the monetary penalty in accordance with the mitigation provisions in Section 22.207.010 if the violation has been corrected. If the Hearing Examiner determines that the violation did not occur, the Hearing Examiner shall enter an order dismissing the citation.
G. Appeal. The Hearing Examiner's decision Section 5. Section 23.91.004 of the Seattle Municipal Code, which was adopted by Ordinance 119473, is amended as follows: SMC 23.91.004 Citation
A. Citation. If after investigation the Director determines that the standards or requirements of provisions referenced in Section 23.91.002 have been violated, the Director may issue a citation to the owner and/or other person or entity responsible
for the violation. The citation shall include the following information
B. Service. The citation may be served by personal service in the manner set forth in RCW 4.28.080 for service of a summons or sent by first class mail, addressed to the last known address of such person(s). Service shall be complete at the time of
personal service, or if mailed, on the date of mailing Section 6. Section 23.91.006 of the Seattle Municipal Code, which was adopted by Ordinance 119473, is amended as follows: SMC 23.91.006 Response to citations.
A. A
1
2
3
B. A response to a citation must be received by the Office of the Hearing Examiner no later than eighteen (18) days after the date the citation is served. When the last day of the appeal period so computed is a Saturday, Sunday, or federal or
City holiday, the period shall run until 5:00 p.m. on the next business day.
Section 7. Section 23.91.010 of the Seattle Municipal Code, which was adopted by Ordinance 119473, is amended as follows: 23.91.010 Mitigation hearings. A. Date and Notice. If a person requests a mitigation hearing, the mitigation hearing shall be held within thirty (30) days after written response to the citation requesting such hearing is received by the Hearing Examiner. Notice of the time, place, and date of the hearing will be sent by first class mail to the address provided in the request for hearing not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. B. Procedure at Hearing. The Hearing Examiner shall hold an informal hearing which shall not be governed by the Rules of Evidence. The person cited may present witnesses, but witnesses may not be compelled to attend. A representative from DCLU may also be present and may present additional information, but attendance by a representative from DCLU is not required.
C. Disposition. The Hearing Examiner shall determine whether the person's explanation justifies reduction of the monetary penalty; however, the monetary penalty may not be reduced unless D. Entry of Order. After hearing the explanation of the person cited and any other information presented at the hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall enter an order finding that the person cited committed the violation and assessing a monetary penalty in an amount determined pursuant to trisection. The Hearing Examiner's decision is the final decision of the City on the matter. Section 8. Section 23.91.012 of the Seattle Municipal Code, which was adopted by Ordinance 119473, is amended as follows: 23.91.012 Contested hearing. A. Date and Notice. If a person requests a contested hearing, the hearing shall be held within sixty (60) days after the written response to the citation requesting such hearing is received. B. Hearing. Contested hearings shall be conducted pursuant to the procedures for hearing contested cases contained in Section 3.02.090 and the rules adopted by the Hearing Examiner for hearing contested cases, except as modified by this section. The issues heard at the hearing shall be limited to those that are raised in writing in the response to the citation and that are within the jurisdiction of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner may issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents. C. Sufficiency. No citation shall be deemed insufficient for failure to contain a detailed statement of the facts constituting the specific violation which the person cited is alleged to have committed or by reason of defects or imperfections, provided such lack of detail, or defects or imperfections do not prejudice substantial rights of the person cited. D. Amendment of Citation. A citation may be amended prior to the conclusion of the hearing to conform to the evidence presented if substantial rights of the person cited are not thereby prejudiced. E. Evidence at Hearing. The certified statement or declaration authorized by RCW 9A.72.085 submitted by an inspector shall be prima facie evidence that a violation occurred and that the person cited is responsible. The certified statement or declaration of the inspector authorized under RCW 9A.72.085 and any other evidence accompanying the report shall be admissible without further evidentiary foundation. Any certifications or declarations authorized under RCW 9A.72.085 shall also be admissible without further evidentiary foundation. The person cited may rebut the DCLU evidence and establish that the cited violation(s) did not occur or that the person contesting the citation is not responsible for the violation. F. Disposition. If the citation is sustained at the hearing, the Hearing Examiner shall enter an order finding that the person cited committed the violation. If the violation remains uncorrected, the Hearing Examiner shall impose the applicable penalty. The Hearing Examiner may reduce the monetary penalty in accordance with the mitigation provisions in 23.91.010 if the violation has been corrected. If the Hearing Examiner determines that the violation did not occur, the Hearing Examiner shall enter an order dismissing the citation.
G. Appeal. The Hearing Examiner's decision Section 9. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its approval by the Mayor, but if not approved and returned by the Mayor within ten (10) days after presentation, it shall take effect as provided by Municipal Code Section 1.04.020. Passed by the City Council the _____ day of ____________, 2000, and signed by me in open session in authentication of its passage this _____ day of _________________, 2000. _____________________________________ President _______ of the City Council Approved by me this _____ day of _________________, 2000. ___________________________________________ Mayor Filed by me this _____ day of ____________________, 2000. ___________________________________________ City Clerk (Seal) smw.smw/kw:kw Feb. 24, 2000 OrdLUPAV4.doc (Ver. 4 ) |
Attachments |
---|